-
Journal of critical care · Mar 2010
Comparative StudyAccuracy of clinical definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia: comparison with autopsy findings.
- Eva Tejerina, Andrés Esteban, Pilar Fernández-Segoviano, Fernando Frutos-Vivar, José Aramburu, Daniel Ballesteros, and José María Rodríguez-Barbero.
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Carretera de Toledo, kilómetro 12.5, 28905 Getafe (Madrid), Spain. evateje@gmail.com
- J Crit Care. 2010 Mar 1;25(1):62-8.
MethodsWe studied patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours who died in the intensive care unit and whose bodies were autopsied. We evaluated 3 clinical definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia: loose definition, defined as chest radiograph infiltrates and 2 of 3 clinical criteria (leukocytosis, fever, purulent respiratory secretions); rigorous definition, defined as chest radiograph infiltrates and all of the clinical criteria; and a clinical pulmonary infection score higher than 6 points. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated by using pathology pattern as criterion standard.ResultsOne hundred forty-two (56%) of the 253 patients included had histological criteria of pneumonia. Patients who met the clinical criteria of ventilator-associated pneumonia were 163 (64%) for the loose definition, 32 (13%) for the rigorous definition, and 109 (43%) for the clinical pulmonary infection score. The operative indexes (sensitivity and specificity) of each definition were as follows: loose definition, 64.8% and 36%; rigorous definition, 91% and 15.5%; and clinical pulmonary infection score higher than 6, 45.8% and 60.4%. The addition of microbiological data to the clinical definitions increased the specificity and decreased the sensitivity but not significantly.ConclusionsAccuracy of 3 commonly used clinical definitions of ventilator-associated pneumonia was poor taking the autopsy findings as reference standard.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.