• Andreas Appelt, Norbert Suhm, Martin Baier, and Peter-Jürgen Meeder.
• Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. andreas.appelt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg S. 2007 Jun 1;33(3):262-7.

AbstractSecondary dislocation, non-union, re-fracture and implant failure are generally known complications after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures with the PFN(®) (Synthes GmbH, Solothurn, Switzerland). The goal of our study was to assess the impact of patient- and treatment-specific risk factors on these complications. Complex fracture type and poor bone quality were defined as patient-specific risk factors. Inadequate fracture reduction and implant position were defined as treatment-specific risk factors. One hundred and seventy-eight cases were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had at least one clinical and radiological follow-up examination 3-6 months after the operation. Fifty percent of the patients were available for one more follow-up at least 1 year after the operation. All patients without patient-specific risk factors had a good outcome, irrespective of whether treatmentspecific risk factors were present or absent. In 153 of the 178 cases, patients had a complex type of fracture and/or poor bone quality. Of these patients, 27 (15.2%) had a poor result. Twenty-four of these patients needed re-operation within 6 months. Complication rate in these patients highly depended on treatment-specific risk factors. We conclude that the PFN is a secure implant for the stabilization of simple cases. Stabilization of complex proximal femoral fractures with the PFN, however, has a relevant complication rate and should therefore be considered a challenge.

4 keywords...

hide…