• G V Poole, D B Morgan, P E Cranston, F F Muakkassa, and J A Griswold.
• Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.
• J Trauma. 1993 Aug 1;35(2):296-300; discussion 300-2.

AbstractComputed tomographic (CT) scanning has proved to be valuable in evaluating the head and abdomen of victims of blunt trauma; CT scans of the thorax often are obtained on patients with blunt torso trauma, but their value for this purpose is unclear. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the role of chest CT scanning in thoracic trauma. Hemodynamically stable patients at least 18 years old with an estimated Abbreviated Injury Scale--Thorax score of 2 or greater underwent a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest, usually in conjunction with CT scans of the head, abdomen, or both. Thirteen patients were dead on arrival, 14 required emergency surgical procedures, and 13 were too unstable to undergo chest CT scan. Thirty-three patients were not included because they refused to participate or the protocol was not followed. Forty-six men (69%) and 21 women with a mean age of 42.7 years completed the study. Sixty-one were injured in motor vehicle crashes, four were injured in falls, and one each was injured by assault and by crushing forces. Injury Severity Scores ranged from 4 to 45, with a mean of 20.5. Four patients died (6%), three from head injury and one from multiple organ dysfunction. Chest roentgenography (CXR) was superior to CT scanning in identifying rib fractures, but CT scanning was more sensitive than CXR for pneumothorax, fluid collections, and infiltrates (p < 0.001); CT scanning also was more specific for aortic injury. Despite this quantitative superiority, the abnormalities missed by CXR but identified by CT scanning infrequently led to a change in management.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

28 keywords...

hide…