• Steve Cunningham, Claire Logan, Linda Lockerbie, Mark J G Dunn, Ann McMurray, and Robin J Prescott.
• Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
• J. Pediatr. 2008 Mar 1;152(3):315-20.

ObjectiveTo determine whether an integrated care pathway (ICP) could improve care delivered to patients coming to an emergency department only or to patients who were subsequently admitted.Study DesignChildren (age, 2-16 years; n = 298) coming to the ED with acute asthma/wheeze, were randomized by using a cluster design to either standard care or care delivered by an ICP.ResultsChildren discharged from the ED who received care with an ICP (n = 118) received more prednisolone (81%; standard, 63%; P = .03) and increased advice to obtain primary care review (72%; standard, 33%; P < .0001). A total of 180 children were admitted (94 ICP, 86 standard). The rate of recovery was unchanged by ICP. The mean ICP length of stay (37.6 hours; range, 33.5-42.4 hours), was 93% of the mean standard length of care (40.7 hours; range, 35.9-46; P = .36). When a discharge checklist was completed (60 of 94 cases), the mean ICP length of stay was 34.2 hours (range, 30.5-38.4 hours; P = .07 versus standard). An ICP resulted in a 30% reduction in prescribing errors (mean, 10.4; standard, 14.8; P = .002). Eighty-four of 94 children with an ICP received a 48-hour discharge plan (89%) versus 35 of 86 children with standard care (41%). More clinical contacts were observed in children receiving care by an ICP (mean, 22, versus standard, 19.2: P = .0004).ConclusionAn acute asthma/wheeze ICP improved education and prescribing errors, modestly reduced the length of stay when discharge criteria were adhered to, but did not influence recovery time. Further consideration of the effect on staff workload is required.

40 keywords...

hide…