• J. Orthop. Res. · Sep 1993

    Comparative Study

    In vitro pharmacokinetics of antibiotic release from locally implantable materials.

    • T Miclau, L E Dahners, and R W Lindsey.
    • Division of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
    • J. Orthop. Res. 1993 Sep 1;11(5):627-32.

    AbstractLocal deposition of antibiotics has became increasingly popular in the management of open fractures or osteomyelitis, and several substances have been employed as the vehicle for delivery. Although the elution characteristics of some substances have been documented, a comparative study of the characteristics of the commonly used substances could establish the clinical indications for particular vehicles. Cylindrical pellets of uniform size (6 x 4 mm) were prepared from bone graft (BG), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), plaster of Paris (POP), or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), with 25 mg of tobramycin/g of substance in each pellet. The pellets were suspended in phosphate buffered saline, and the antibiotic concentration in the buffer was determined at various time intervals by an enzyme immunoassay. BG and DBM eluted 70 and 45% of their antibiotic load by 24 h, and negligible amounts were detected at 1 week; POP released 17% of its load by 24 h, with trace amounts detected at 3 weeks; and PMMA eluted 7% at 24 h, with trace amounts detected for as long as 14 days. These findings suggest that the optimal vehicle for local deposition of antibiotic depends on the clinical setting. BG and DBM may be best employed when brief antibiotic coverage is required (as for acute contaminated open fractures), whereas POP and PMMA may be better suited for long-term coverage (such as for established osteomyelitis).

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…