• Joho Tokumine, Kazuhiro Sugahara, Kouji Gushiken, Minoru Ohta, Tomoaki Matsuyama, and Satoko Saikawa.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Japan. tokumine2003@yahoo.co.jp
• Anesth. Analg. 2005 Apr 1;100(4):1056-8.

AbstractThe non-zero basal flow (BF) of oxygen in anesthesia machines has been set to supply the basal metabolic requirement of oxygen. However, there is no scientific evidence of its necessity. In this study we sought to clarify whether non-zero BF affects leak detection during preanesthetic inspections. Twenty-five participants performed leak tests on anesthesia machines to detect breathing circuit leaks. Artificial leak-producing devices were used to create leaks from 0 to 1.0 L/min. The investigator randomly chose the leak device and connected it into the breathing circuit. Participants, blinded as to the presence or the type of leak producing device, then tested the breathing circuit for leaks. The conventional breathing system leak test was performed with and without BF. The results of leak detection in each leak procedure were analyzed statistically. The leak detection rate of leak test with BF was less than without BF (P < 0.01). We demonstrated that non-zero BF of oxygen decreases the leak detection rate and is an obstacle for leak detection, especially for small leaks. Therefore, we recommend that breathing circuit leak tests should be performed in the absence of BF of oxygen.

11 keywords...

hide…