• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jul 2011

    Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

    • John T Schousboe, Karla Kerlikowske, Andrew Loh, and Steven R Cummings.
    • Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, USA. scho0600@umn.edu
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):10-20.

    BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend mammography every 1 or 2 years starting at age 40 or 50 years, regardless of individual risk for breast cancer.ObjectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of mammography by age, breast density, history of breast biopsy, family history of breast cancer, and screening interval.DesignMarkov microsimulation model.Data SourcesSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, and the medical literature.Target PopulationU.S. women aged 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 79 years with initial mammography at age 40 years and breast density of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 1 to 4.Time HorizonLifetime.PerspectiveNational health payer.InterventionMammography annually, biennially, or every 3 to 4 years or no mammography.Outcome MeasuresCosts per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and number of women screened over 10 years to prevent 1 death from breast cancer.Results Of Base Case AnalysisBiennial mammography cost less than $100,000 per QALY gained for women aged 40 to 79 years with BI-RADS category 3 or 4 breast density or aged 50 to 69 years with category 2 density; women aged 60 to 79 years with category 1 density and either a family history of breast cancer or a previous breast biopsy; and all women aged 40 to 79 years with both a family history of breast cancer and a previous breast biopsy, regardless of breast density. Biennial mammography cost less than $50,000 per QALY gained for women aged 40 to 49 years with category 3 or 4 breast density and either a previous breast biopsy or a family history of breast cancer. Annual mammography was not cost-effective for any group, regardless of age or breast density.Results Of Sensitivity AnalysisMammography is expensive if the disutility of false-positive mammography results and the costs of detecting nonprogressive and nonlethal invasive cancer are considered.LimitationResults are not applicable to carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.ConclusionMammography screening should be personalized on the basis of a woman's age, breast density, history of breast biopsy, family history of breast cancer, and beliefs about the potential benefit and harms of screening.Primary Funding SourceEli Lilly, Da Costa Family Foundation for Research in Breast Cancer Prevention of the California Pacific Medical Center, and Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…