• Z Salihoglu, S Demiroluk, Demirkiran, and Y Kose.
• University of Istanbul, Medical Faculty of Cerrahpasa, Department of Anaesthesia, Turkey. zsalihoglu@yahoo.com
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Feb 1;19(2):125-8.

Background And ObjectiveThe effects of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl were compared on cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients.MethodsEighty morbidly obese ASA I-II patients were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into four groups to receive either 1 microgkg(-1) fentanyl (Group F), 10 microgkg(-1) alfentanil (A), 1 microgkg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.5 pg kg min(-1) remifentanil (R) or saline (P). The patients corrected weight was used to calculate the drug doses. Body mass indices (range) were: 54.3 +/- 7.37 (49-78.4), 55.67 +/- 7.44 (48.5-78.4), 53.17 +/- 5.36 (48.1-63.2), and 56.3 +/- 6.09 (46.6-67.7) kg m(-2), in Groups F, R, A and P respectively. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures and heart rate were measured non-invasively at three time points, which were 2 min before induction, 2 min after induction and 2 min after endotracheal intubation.ResultsAfter induction of anaesthesia, arterial pressures decreased significantly in all groups, but the decrease was more pronounced in Groups A and R. After induction, heart rate decreased significantly in all groups except in Group P. After intubation, haemodynamic responses were similar in the remifentanil, fentanyl and alfentanil groups and were within normal limits. In Group P, arterial pressures and heart rates were significantly higher.ConclusionsAlfentanil, fentanyl and remifentanil in the doses described had similar effects in controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation in ASA I-II morbidly obese patients.

22 keywords...

hide…