• M Rab, K F Schrögendorfer, W Girsch, L P Kamolz, H Beck, G Wagner, F Schlemmer, R Högler, O Aszmann, and M Frey.
• Klinische Abteilung für Wiederherstellungs- und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Wien.
• Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2001 Mar 1;33(2):121-8.

AbstractThe goal of the presented carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) follow-up study was to compare the clinical value of the Millesi hand function score with the "Pressure Specifying Sensory Device" (PSSD) introduced by A. L. Dellon using self-administered patient questionnaires. 25 patients (10 male, 15 female) with an electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were enrolled in this study, performing one preoperative and five postoperative examinations over 24 weeks. 12 of the 25 patients underwent an "open" two-portal carpal tunnel release with two minimal incisions (group OT); the other 13 patients were treated with a two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release (group ET). Additionally, in eleven out of the twelve patients of group OT, an epineuriotomy of the median nerve was performed during the same session. Concerning preoperative data of the Millesi score and the PSSD, no statistically significant differences were found between group OT and ET. However, preoperative comparison with the contralateral hand demonstrated a reduction in hand function of 15% and an increase in the pressure perception threshold of 41% compared to normative data could be measured with the PSSD. The subjective functional value of the hand was objectively evacuated using the Levine score. In the second postoperative week, a significant decrease in hand function could be obtained with the Millesi score in group OT. In group ET, the decrease in hand function representing the operative trauma was significantly lower than in group OT. Data of the static one- and two-point pressure perception threshold revealed a statistically significant improvement of the sensibility in both groups. The results of the Millesi score recorded at the last examination in the 24th postoperative week showed an improvement in hand function in both groups compared to preoperative data. Concerning static one- and two-point measurements with the PSSD, distinct improvements compared to the preoperative data could also be detected in both groups although significant differences between group OT and ET were evident: Data of group OT regarding the whole postoperative course demonstrate a continuous improvement in sensibility of the index finger. In contrast, the analysis of the PSSD measurements in group ET revealed an increase in all the parameters starting in the sixth postoperative week and ending with significantly worse static one- and two-point threshold measurements than in group OT. On the other hand, data of self-administered patient questionnaires using the Levine Score revealed significant improvements in hand function and reduction in pain intensity in both groups compared to preoperative results. Differences between both groups at the end of the examination course were not evident. In conclusion, the Millesi hand score with its emphasis on the motor function proved to be a reliable method to record the severity of CTS preoperatively, the severity of the surgical trauma and changes in the course of rehabilitation of the affected hand. A good correlation was found between data obtained with the Millesi Score and the self-administered patient questionnaires according to Levine. But when compared with the PSSD, both methods could not directly document the preoperative status and postoperative changes of the median nerve. Preoperative static two-point pressure threshold measurements with the PSSD confirmed their status as a screening parameter as published by A. L. Dellon. In the postoperative course of group ET, a distinct worsening in the sensibility of the index and little finger could only be detected with the PSSD before the patients noticed the onset of related symptoms.

25 keywords...

hide…