-
Comparative Study
[Glidescope: a comparison of percentage of glottic opening score between middle size and large size handles].
- Nobuhiro Shimada, Yoshihiro Hibayashi, and Norimasa Seo.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke 329-0498.
- Masui. 2011 Oct 1;60(10):1221-3.
BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare the percent of glottic opening score between middle-size (#3) and large-size (#4) handles during laryngoscopy using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GVL) in Japanese women.MethodsIn 80 Japanese women receiving general anesthesia for surgical procedures, laryngoscopy was performed using GVL #3 handle and GVL #4 handle. We compared the percentage of glottic opening score between the two handles on each patient.ResultsThe percentage of glottic opening score was higher with GVL #3 handle than with GVL #4 handle [66 +/- 28% (mean +/- SD), vs. 53 +/- 34%, P < 0.05).ConclusionsThe use of GVL #3 handle is recommended for tracheal intubation for Japanese women.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.