-
Diabetes Technol. Ther. · Feb 2011
Comparative StudyA new index to optimally design and compare continuous glucose monitoring glucose prediction algorithms.
- Andrea Facchinetti, Giovanni Sparacino, Emanuele Trifoglio, and Claudio Cobelli.
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
- Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011 Feb 1;13(2):111-9.
BackgroundContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data can be exploited to prevent hypo-/hyperglycemic events in real time by forecasting future glucose levels. In the last few years, several glucose prediction algorithms have been proposed, but how to compare them (e.g., methods based on polynomial rather than autoregressive time-series models) and even how to determine the optimal parameter set for a given method (e.g., prediction horizon and forgetting) are open problems.MethodsA new index, J, is proposed to optimally design a prediction algorithm by taking into account two key components: the regularity of the predicted profile and the time gained thanks to prediction. Effectiveness of J is compared with previously proposed criteria such as the root mean square error (RMSE) and continuous glucose-error grid analysis (CG-EGA) on 20 Menarini (Florence, Italy) Glucoday® CGM data sets.ResultsFor a given prediction algorithm, the new index J is able to suggest a more consistent and better parameter set (e.g., prediction horizon and forgetting factor of choice) than RMSE and CG-EGA. In addition, the minimization of J can reliably be used as a selection criterion in comparing different prediction methods.ConclusionsThe new index can be used to compare different prediction strategies and to optimally design their parameters.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.