• M B Gillespie and D W Eisele.
• Department of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21203-6402, USA.
• Laryngoscope. 1999 Nov 1;109(11):1766-9.

ObjectiveTo review the circumstances, complications, and outcomes of emergency surgical airway procedures and to compare the relative merits of cricothyroidotomy and tracheotomy for airway control in a hospital-wide patient population.Study DesignRetrospective review.MethodsPatient data were obtained from the inpatient charts and electronic patient records of 35 patients who required an emergency surgical airway over a 6-year period at an urban medical center.ResultsEmergency cricothyroidotomy and tracheotomy were successfully performed in 34 of 35 patients (97%). Orotracheal intubation was successfully achieved in one patient with a failed cricothyroidotomy. The overall complication rates for emergency cricothyroidotomy and tracheotomy were similar (20% and 21%, respectively). Inpatients requiring an emergency surgical airway had a higher complication rate (32% vs. 0%) but better overall survival (91% vs. 46%) than patients treated in the emergency department. No long-term complications were observed from emergency cricothyroidotomies that were not converted to tracheotomies.ConclusionThe establishment of an emergency surgical airway by either tracheotomy or cricothyroidotomy is effective with low overall morbidity. The need to convert every emergency cricothyroidotomy to a tracheotomy should be reevaluated.

14 keywords...

hide…