• H Bouaziz, P Narchi, F J Mercier, T Labaille, N Zerrouk, J Girod, and D Benhamou.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France.
• Anesth. Analg. 1997 May 1;84(5):1058-62.

AbstractWe undertook this prospective, randomized study to compare the success rate, time spent performing the blocks, onset time of surgical anesthesia, presence of complete motor blockade, and lidocaine plasma concentrations between conventional axillary block and a new approach at the midhumeral level. Both techniques were performed using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Two nerves were located at the axillary crease, whereas four nerves were located at the midhumeral level. Sixty patients undergoing upper limb surgery were assigned to one of the two techniques. The sensory block was evaluated before surgery for all of the distributions of the four major nerves of the upper extremity. A subset of patients had lidocaine plasma concentrations determined. Times to perform the blocks, mean maximum plasma lidocaine concentration, and time to peak concentration were not different between groups. The success rate of the block, as well as the incidence of complete motor blockade, was greater with the midhumeral approach compared with the axillary approach. However, the onset time to complete anesthesia of the upper extremity was shorter in the axillary approach. For brachial plexus anesthesia, we conclude that the midhumeral approach provided a greater success rate than the traditional axillary approach.

16 keywords...

hide…