• P W Tucker, J R Smith, and D F Adams.
• Department of Periodontology. Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
• J. Periodontol. 1996 Feb 1;67(2):125-9.

AbstractA single blind study of 24 patients compared the postoperative periodontal pain relief and adverse effects associated with a pretreatment regimen with etodolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), to a typical pro re nada (prn) regimen with a combination of acetaminophen with hydrocodone. Patients selected required one or more periodontal osseous surgeries that were judged to involve relatively similar degrees of surgical manipulation. Patients in the etodolac group received two 300 mg capsules 30 minutes prior to surgery and then redosed themselves prn. Patients who received the combination drug were not premedicated and followed a prn regimen. The subjects used a verbal analogue scale to report levels of pain hourly for the first 8 hours (starting 30 minutes prior to surgery) and also indicated any side effects experienced during the first week after surgery. Specific parameters monitored were the mean sum of hourly pain scores, mean hourly pain scores, time to first medication, number of postoperative doses, and adverse effects. Of the parameters studied, the only one that showed a statistically significant difference was the time to first medication. The time span from 30 minutes prior to the beginning of surgery to the first postsurgical dose was greater for etodolac than for the combination drug. However, the total number of medications taken under both regimens was similar. The side effects were minimal for both of the drugs studied. It was concluded that the analgesic regimens tested under clinical practice conditions were comparable in providing analgesia with minimum side effects in uncomplicated periodontal osseous surgery. Studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to definitively address whether these regimens are truly equivalent.

40 keywords...

hide…