• American heart journal · Mar 2008

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Missed opportunities for reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) study.

    • Albert J Tricomi, David J Magid, John S Rumsfeld, David R Vinson, Ella E Lyons, Laurie Crounse, P Michael Ho, Pamela N Peterson, Frederick A Masoudi, and Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) Study Investigators.
    • University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, NY, USA.
    • Am. Heart J. 2008 Mar 1;155(3):471-7.

    BackgroundAlthough it is known that reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is underused, the reasons for the failure to provide this potentially life-saving treatment are not well described.MethodsIn a cohort of 2215 consecutive patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction to 5 emergency departments in Colorado and California between 2000 and 2002, patients with ischemic symptoms and ST-segment elevation on electrocardiogram without documented guideline-based contraindications to therapy were identified as eligible reperfusion candidates. Multivariable logistic models were constructed to identify factors associated with the failure to receive reperfusion. The emergency department records of patients not receiving reperfusion were reviewed to categorize the reasons therapy was not provided.ResultsOf 460 eligible patients, 102 (22%) did not receive reperfusion therapy. Patient factors associated with failure to receive reperfusion therapy included older age, peripheral vascular disease, and absence of chest pain; patients seen by both resident and attending physicians were more likely to receive treatment than those seen by an attending alone. In cases where reperfusion was not provided, ST-segment elevation was not identified in 34% (n = 35), left bundle-branch block was not considered as an indication in 13% (n = 13), there was documentation of a reason for withholding therapy not supported by guidelines in 34% (n = 35), and there was no documentation of reasons for withholding reperfusion in 19% (n = 19).ConclusionsInitiatives to improve electrocardiogram interpretation and evidence-based patient selection may reduce gaps in the delivery of reperfusion therapy to eligible candidates and thereby potentially improve STEMI outcomes.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…