• Pain · Feb 2014

    How do people understand their neuropathic pain? A Q-study.

    • Sally Martin, Clare Daniel, and Amanda C de C Williams.
    • Previously, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
    • Pain. 2014 Feb 1;155(2):349-55.

    AbstractNeuropathic pain (NP) is not easy to understand for those with the diagnosis. Even in specialist medical services, explanation may not be given or may not be integrated with patients' existing beliefs about their conditions. We were curious about how people with NP conceptualised the problem. Web sites relevant to NP were used to recruit 79 people with NP. They were sampled using Q-methodology, which requires sorting according to degree of agreement or disagreement with diverse statements about NP, derived from the widest possible range of sources. The sets of sorted statements are analysed for factors which represent shared constructions. The four factors that we found differed in important ways: (1) identification of nerve damage as cause; (2) the necessity of identifying cause; (3) the acceptability of symptomatic treatment; (4) the existence or not of psychological influences; and (5) the usefulness of psychological treatment. The meaning of these factors was extended by participants' free comments: certain viewpoints showed associations with their medical and treatment histories and with the interference of pain with daily life. Overall, a biopsychosocial model of pain was only weakly represented, and no integrated model of pain emerged across the four different accounts. There was little reference to NP having been explained when the diagnosis was made. This study highlights the need for more accessible explanations of NP within and outside medical services if people with NP are to use their understanding of NP to help them manage their pain and reduce its impact on their lives.Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.