-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Tiotropium versus placebo for inadequately controlled asthma: a meta-analysis.
- Jing-wei Tian, Jin-wu Chen, Rui Chen, and Xin Chen.
- Department of Respiratory Diseases.
- Respir Care. 2014 May 1;59(5):654-66.
ObjectiveThis meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of tiotropium to standard treatment regimens for inadequately controlled asthma.MethodsA systematic search was made of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and a hand search of leading respiratory journals. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials on the treatment of inadequately controlled asthma for ≥ 4 weeks with the addition of tiotropium, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), with 95% CI.ResultsSix trials met the inclusion criteria. The addition of tiotropium, compared with placebo, significantly improved all spirometric indices, including morning and evening peak expiratory flow (WMD 20.59 L/min, 95% CI 15.36-25.81 L/min, P < .001; and WMD 24.95 L/min, 95% CI 19.22-30.69 L/min, P < .001, respectively), trough and peak FEV1 (WMD 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.09-0.18 L, P < .001; and WMD 0.10 L, 95% CI 0.06-0.14 L, P < .001, respectively), the area under the curve of the first 3 h of FEV1 (WMD 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.08-0.18 L, P < .001), trough and peak FVC (WMD 0.1 L, 95% CI 0.05-0.15 L, P < .001; and WMD 0.08 L, 95% CI 0.04-0.13 L, P < .001, respectively), the area under the curve of the first 3 h of FVC (WMD 0.11 L, 95% CI 0.06-0.15 L, P < .001). The mean change in the 7-point Asthma Control Questionnaire score (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.03, P = .01) was markedly lower in tiotropium group, but not clinically important. There were no significant differences in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (WMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.20, P = .09), night awakenings (WMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.05, P = .99) or rescue medication use (WMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.00, P = .06). No significant increase was noticed in adverse events in the tiotropium group (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62-1.03, P = .08).ConclusionsThe addition of tiotropium to standard treatment regimens has significantly improved lung function without increasing adverse events in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Long-term trials are required to assess the effects of the addition of tiotropium on asthma exacerbations and mortality.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.