• Colm P F O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, and Colin J Morley.
• Division of Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Australia. colm.odonnell@rwh.org.au
• Acta Paediatr. 2005 Sep 1;94(9):1261-5.

AimNeonatal resuscitation is a common and important intervention. International consensus statements advise how newborns should be resuscitated and suggest equipment to be used. Use of equipment not specifically recommended in these guidelines has been advocated. We wished to determine how widely this supplementary equipment is used in a geographically defined region.MethodsEach of the 25 tertiary perinatal centres with on-site deliveries in Australia and New Zealand was surveyed. The questionnaire asked about the use of the following items during delivery room resuscitation: pulse oximetry, exhaled carbon dioxide detection, polyethylene wrapping, oxygen blenders, laryngeal mask and oropharyngeal airways.ResultsData were obtained from all centres. Pulse oximetry is used at 12 (48%) centres. Exhaled CO2 detection is used to confirm endotracheal tube placement at three (12%) of the centres. Polyethylene wrapping is used to prevent heat loss in very-low-birthweight infants at delivery at 11 (44%) centres. Oxygen blenders are used to modify the amount of oxygen delivered at nine (36%) centres. Laryngeal mask airways are infrequently used at two (8%) centres. Oropharyngeal airways are infrequently used at five (20%) centres.ConclusionThere is considerable variation in the equipment and techniques used to resuscitate newly born infants. Use of equipment not specifically recommended in international consensus statements is widespread. These are potentially effective tools to improve resuscitation. The evidence supporting their use is, however, limited. Urgent evaluation of their efficacy and safety is required before even more widespread use occurs.

21 keywords...

hide…