• Malford Tyson Pillow, Donald Stader, Matthew Nguyen, Dazhe Cao, Robert McArthur, and Shkelzen Hoxhaj.
• Section of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Simulation Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
• J Emerg Med. 2014 May 1; 46 (5): 695-700.

BackgroundBasic Life Support (BLS), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) are integral parts of emergency resuscitative care. Although this training is usually reserved for residents, introducing the training in the medical student curriculum may enhance acquisition and retention of these skills.ObjectivesWe developed a survey to characterize the perceptions and needs of graduating medical students regarding BLS, ACLS, and PALS training.MethodsThis was a study of graduating 4th-year medical students at a U.S. medical school. The students were surveyed prior to participating in an ACLS course in March of their final year.ResultsOf 152 students, 109 (71.7%) completed the survey; 48.6% of students entered medical school without any prior training and 47.7% started clinics without training; 83.4% of students reported witnessing an average of 3.0 in-hospital cardiac arrests during training (range of 0-20). Overall, students rated their preparedness 2.0 (SD 1.0) for adult resuscitations and 1.7 (SD 0.9) for pediatric resuscitations on a 1-5 Likert scale, with 1 being unprepared. A total of 36.8% of students avoided participating in resuscitations due to lack of training; 98.2%, 91.7%, and 64.2% of students believe that BLS, ACLS, and PALS, respectively, should be included in the medical student curriculum.ConclusionsAs per previous studies that have examined this topic, students feel unprepared to respond to cardiac arrests and resuscitations. They feel that training is needed in their curriculum and would possibly enhance perceived comfort levels and willingness to participate in resuscitations.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…