• Yih-Wen Tarng, Shan-Wei Yang, Yen-Po Fang, and Chien-Jen Hsu.
• Department of Emergency, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
• J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jun 1;21(6):732-40.

BackgroundThis study compared titanium elastic nail (TEN) fixation with plate fixation in patients with uncomplicated midshaft clavicle fractures.MethodsThe records of 57 patients with midshaft clavicular fractures that were operated on within 2 weeks after injury at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient received either TENs (n = 25) or fixation with a 3.5-mm reconstruction plate (n = 32) depending on the preference of the operating surgeon. Operative parameters, postoperative pain and function scores, complications, and fracture union time were determined.ResultsThere was no difference in the fracture pattern distribution between the 2 groups, and all operations were performed without complications. Operation time, wound size, blood loss, length of hospitalization, and subjective time to pain relief were less for the TEN group than for the 3.5-mm reconstruction plate fixation group (P < .001 for all). Patients in the TEN group showed a greater range of shoulder motion and higher Constant scores than those in the plate fixation group up to 18 weeks after surgery (P < .001 for all). Fewer patients in the TEN group, 4 (16%), requested removal of the implant, as compared with 12 (37.5%) in the plate group.ConclusionFixation of uncomplicated midshaft clavicle fractures with TENs provides adequate fixation and faster relief of pain and return to normal function of the affected shoulder than fixation with 3.5-mm reconstruction plates.Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…