-
Journal of neurotrauma · Sep 2001
Neuropsychological outcome in relation to the traumatic coma data bank classification of computed tomography imaging.
- M Mataró, M A Poca, J Sahuquillo, S Pedraza, M Ariza, S Amoros, and C Junqué.
- The Neurotraumatology Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospitals, Barcelona, Spain.
- J. Neurotrauma. 2001 Sep 1;18(9):869-79.
AbstractThe Traumatic Coma Data Bank (TCDB) classification of CT (computed tomography) scan has been related to the general outcome and intracranial pressure evolution. Our aim was to analyse the relationship of this classification with neuropsychological outcome and late indices of ventricular dilatation. Fifty-seven patients with a moderate or severe head injury (mean admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score, 7.7) were studied from 122 consecutive cases. There were 49 males and 8 females (mean age, 27.7 years). Subjects were classified into TCDB categories on the basis of their most serious acute CT scan finding. From the last control CT scan image, performed at a mean of 6.12 months postinjury, several measures of ventricular dilatation were calculated. Neuropsychological assessment at 6-month included tests of verbal and visual memory, visuoconstructive functions, fine motor speed, and frontal lobe functions. Patients with diffuse injury type I showed better neuropsychological outcome than patients with more severe diffuse injuries and those with mass lesions. Within the diffuse injury groups, the degree of diffuse damage was related to measures of verbal memory and attention and cognitive flexibility. Ventricular enlargement was more evident in patients with mass lesions and it decreased in the remaining groups as the severity of diffuse injury diminished. These results show that there is a relationship between acute intracranial lesion diagnosis according to TCDB classification and neuropsychological results and ventricular dilatation indices at 6 months postinjury.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.