• Anil K Seth, Zoltán Dienes, Axel Cleeremans, Morten Overgaard, and Luiz Pessoa.
• Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK. a.k.seth@sussex.ac.uk
• Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.). 2008 Aug 1;12(8):314-21.

AbstractThe resurgent science of consciousness has been accompanied by a recent emphasis on the problem of measurement. Having dependable measures of consciousness is essential both for mapping experimental evidence to theory and for designing perspicuous experiments. Here, we review a series of behavioural and brain-based measures, assessing their ability to track graded consciousness and clarifying how they relate to each other by showing what theories are presupposed by each. We identify possible and actual conflicts among measures that can stimulate new experiments, and we conclude that measures must prove themselves by iteratively building knowledge in the context of theoretical frameworks. Advances in measuring consciousness have implications for basic cognitive neuroscience, for comparative studies of consciousness and for clinical applications.

8 keywords...

hide…