• J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Oct 2005

    Comparative Study

    A cross-sectional study comparing pain and disability levels in patients with low back pain with and without transitional lumbosacral vertebrae.

    • Cynthia K Peterson, Jennifer Bolton, William Hsu, and Angela Wood.
    • Department of Radiology, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. cpeterson@cmcc.ca
    • J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Oct 1;28(8):570-4.

    ObjectiveTo determine whether patients with transitional lumbosacral vertebrae report more pain and disability compared with patients with normal lumbar vertebrae.MethodsRadiographic and questionnaire data were collected from 353 patients with low back pain. Back pain severity was measured using 2 scales: one for pain over the entire episode and the other for pain during the previous week. All patients completed the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire before radiography was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without a transitional lumbosacral vertebra. Differences between patient groups were investigated using the unpaired t test. Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to investigate the effect of the transitional lumbosacral vertebrae on pain and disability controlling for the effects of age and sex.ResultsForty-three patients (12.2%) had a transitional lumbosacral vertebra. There were no differences in pain or disability levels between the 2 groups on any of the pain scales or Revised Oswestry subscales. Older patients reported significantly more pain (P = .039) and disability (P = .002) than younger patients.ConclusionsThe presence of a transitional lumbosacral vertebra in this group of patients was not related to an increased level of reported low back pain or disability.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.