• Annals of plastic surgery · Mar 2012

    Infrared fluorescence imaging of lymphatic regeneration in nonhuman primate facial vascularized composite allografts.

    • Gerhard S Mundinger, Mitsunaga Narushima, Helen G Hui-Chou, Luke S Jones, Jinny S Ha, Steven T Shipley, Cinthia B Drachenberg, Amir H Dorafshar, Isao Koshima, Stephen T Bartlett, Rolf N Barth, and Eduardo D Rodriguez.
    • Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Maxillofacial Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
    • Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Mar 1;68(3):314-9.

    BackgroundClinical vascularized composite allografts (VCA), although performed with good success, have been characterized by rejection episodes and postoperative graft edema. We investigated lymphatic donor-recipient reconstitution and lymphatic regeneration in a nonhuman primate facial VCA model.MethodsHeterotopic partial face (n = 9) VCAs were performed in cynomolgus macaques. Grafts were monitored for rejection episodes and response to immunosuppressive therapies as previously described. Donor and recipient lymphatic channels were evaluated using a near-infrared handheld dual-channel light-emitting diode camera system capable of detecting fluorescence from indocyanine green injections. Graft lymphatic channels were serially evaluated from postoperative day 0 to 364.ResultsPreoperative imaging demonstrated superficial lymphatic anatomy similar to human anatomy. Initial resolution of facial allograft swelling coincided with superficial donor-recipient lymphatic channel reconstitution. Reconstitution occurred despite early acute rejection episodes in 2 animals. However, lymphatic channels demonstrated persistent functional and anatomic pathology, and graft edema never fully resolved. No differences in lymphatic channels were noted between grafts that developed transplant vasculopathy (n = 3) and those that did not (n = 6). Dynamic changes in patterns of lymphatic drainage were noted in 4 animals following withdrawal of immunosuppression.ConclusionsDonor-recipient lymphatic channel regeneration following VCA did not result in resolution of edema. Technical causes of graft edema may be overcome with alternative surgical techniques, allowing for direct investigation of the immunologic relationship between VCA graft edema and rejection responses. Mechanisms and timing of dynamic donor-recipient lymphatic channel relationships can be evaluated using fluorescent imaging systems to better define the immunologic role of lymphatic channels in VCA engraftment and rejection responses, which may have direct clinical implications.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…