-
Critical care medicine · Mar 2014
Comparative StudySepsis Visits and Antibiotic Utilization in U.S. Emergency Departments.
- Michael R Filbin, Sarah A Arias, Carlos A Camargo, Apurv Barche, and Daniel J Pallin.
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA.
- Crit. Care Med.. 2014 Mar 1;42(3):528-35.
ObjectivesTo monitor the frequency of sepsis visits in U.S. emergency departments and assess the appropriateness of antibiotic utilization.DesignWe analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, defining sepsis as an explicit diagnosis of sepsis via International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes 038, 995.91, 995.92, or 785.52. We also monitored trends using cases inferred by infection plus organ dysfunction without explicit diagnosis of sepsis, which we refer to as implicit sepsis cases. We assess changes in visit frequency and ascertain emergency department antibiotic administration rates.SettingFour-stage probability sample of visits to U.S. emergency departments, excluding Federal/military.PatientsAdult emergency department visits, United States, 1994-2009.Measurements And Main ResultsSepsis was diagnosed explicitly at 260,000 visits per year in U.S. emergency departments (95% CI, 251,000-270,000) or 1.23 visits per 1,000 U.S. population. The visit rate remained stable from 1994 to 2009 (p for trend 0.42). By contrast, the rate of visits with an implicit diagnosis of sepsis increased by 0.07 every 2 years (95% CI, 0.04-0.10; p for trend 0.002). Antibiotics were prescribed in the emergency department during 61% (95% CI, 57-65) of explicit sepsis visits. This increased from 52% in 1994-1997 to 69% in 2006-2009 (difference, 17%; 95% CI, 16.8-17.2). Of antibiotic regimens, 18% covered methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 27% Pseudomonas, and 10% extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria, without evidence of targeting according to known risk factors. Of explicit sepsis cases, 31% were admitted to the ICU with 40% mortality (95% CI, 30-51). Overall hospital mortality was 17% (95% CI, 11-22).ConclusionsExplicitly diagnosed sepsis visits did not become more common during 1994-2009. Our data suggest that many emergency department patients with sepsis do not receive antibiotics until they arrive on the inpatient unit. When antibiotics are used among septic emergency department patients, drug-resistant bacteria are covered infrequently. These methods provide a simple approach to tracking the frequency with which sepsis is diagnosed among emergency department patients and to monitoring antibiotic therapy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.