• Ann Emerg Med · Dec 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of Web-versus classroom-based basic ultrasonographic and EFAST training in 2 European hospitals.

    • Elke Platz, Katja Goldflam, Maria Mennicke, Emilio Parisini, Michael Christ, and Christian Hohenstein.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. eplatz@partners.org
    • Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Dec 1;56(6):660-7.

    Study ObjectiveTraining physicians in new skills through classroom-based teaching has inherent cost and time constraints. We seek to evaluate whether Web-based didactics result in similar knowledge improvement and retention of basic ultrasonographic principles and the Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (EFAST) compared with the traditional method.MethodsPhysicians from 2 German emergency departments were randomized into a classroom group with traditional lectures and a Web group who watched narrated lectures online. All participants completed a pre- and posttest and a second posttest 8 weeks later. Both groups underwent hands-on training after the first posttest. A control group completed the 2 initial tests without didactic intervention.ResultsFifty-five subjects participated in the study. Both the classroom and Web group showed significant improvement in pre- and posttest 1 scores (75.9% versus 93.9% and 77.8% versus 92.5%; P<.001 for both), with similar knowledge retention after 8 weeks (88.6% and 88.9%; P=.87). No statistically significant difference in mean test scores could be found between the 2 groups at each point: -1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.2% to 1.4%) for the pretest, 1.4% (95% CI -0.6% to 3.4%) for posttest 1, and -0.3% (95% CI -3.9% to 3.3%) for posttest 2. The control group showed no learning effect without intervention (83.3% versus 82.8%, ; P=.88).ConclusionWeb-based learning provides the potential to teach physicians with greater flexibility than classroom instruction. Our data suggest that Web-based ultrasonography and EFAST didactics are comparable to traditional classroom lectures and result in similar knowledge retention.Copyright © 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…