• Sun-Ho Lee, Eun Sang Kim, Joo-Kyung Sung, Yeun-Mook Park, and Whan Eoh.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
• J Clin Neurosci. 2010 Jul 1;17(7):886-92.

AbstractWe compared the clinical and radiological results of posterior atlantoaxial fixation surgery using transarticular screws to those using a polyaxial screw-rod system in 55 patients with symptomatic atlantoaxial instability. Patients underwent posterior C1-C2 fixation: 28 patients (group 1) underwent C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation and 27 patients (group 2) underwent C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixation. Patients were followed-up for at least 24 months. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated in the early postoperative period and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Long-term postoperative stability and bone fusion were examined. After surgery, 93% of patients in group 1 and 96% of patients in group 2 were free of neck pain. The solid fusion rates were 82% for group 1 patients and 96% for group 2 patients at 12 months (p<0.092). In group 1, three patients showed fibrous union. Four patients had hardware failure due to a screw malposition (one in group 1) and pseudoarthrodesis (two in group 1 and one in group 2). One patient in group 1 had cerebrospinal fluid leakage. One patient in group 2 had occipital neuralgia. One vertebral artery injury occurred during the screw placement in group 1 and another in group 2 during the muscle dissection. C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation and C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixation both produced excellent results for stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex, but the radiological outcome tended to be superior in C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw fixation.

29 keywords...

hide…