• Minerva anestesiologica · Jan 2009

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Prospective randomized, blind comparison of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for superficial plexus anesthesia in carotid endoarterectomy.

    • M Messina, S Magrin, E Bignami, G Maj, A Carozzo, R Mennella, G Landoni, and A Zangrillo.
    • Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
    • Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan 1;75(1-2):7-12.

    BackgroundThe authors performed a study to evaluate if the onset time, duration of sensory block, and quality of postoperative analgesia in superficial cervical plexus anesthesia with 0.5% levobupivacaine (1 mg/kg) was greater than 0.75% ropivacaine (1.5 mg/kg).MethodsDesignrandomized, double-blind study.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.Participants28 consecutive patients undergoing elective carotid thromboendoarterectomy were randomized into two groups.Interventionspatients received either 1 mg/kg of 0.5% levobupivacaine (N.=15), or 1.5 mg/kg of 0.75% ropivacaine (N.=13). We assessed the onset time (pinprick test), duration of sensory block, and postoperative analgesia with the two drugs.ResultsOnset time of sensory block was 20+/-6 min with ropivacaine and 29+/-8 min with levobupivacaine (P=0.003). Intraoperatively we used different total doses of lidocaine, with the median (interquartile range) dose of 50 (40-100) mg for ropivacaine and 130 (60-180) mg for levobupivacaine (P=0.05). The first pain medication was requested after 12+/-0.4 h by ropivacaine patients and after 11+/-1.6 h by levobupivacaine patients (P=0.5).ConclusionNo beneficial effect was noted in the quality of nerve block or patient's satisfaction for 0.5% levobupivacaine when compared to 0.75% ropivacaine.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.