• Joint Bone Spine · May 2009

    Reliability of a modified Modic classification of bone marrow changes in lumbar spine MRI.

    • Fouad Fayad, Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau, Jean-Luc Drapé, Antoine Feydy, Nathalie Chemla, Nathalie Quintéro, François Rannou, Serge Poiraudeau, Jacques Fermanian, and Michel Revel.
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University, 75679 Paris Cedex 14, France. fouadfayad@yahoo.fr
    • Joint Bone Spine. 2009 May 1;76(3):286-9.

    ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of a modified Modic classification for bone marrow changes seen on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), taking into consideration mixed signals.MethodsLumbar MRI scans from 94 patients with low back pain were assessed independently by 2 spine specialists (senior [senior1], junior) and a radiologist (senior2). One reviewer (senior1) assessed the MR images twice at a three-week interval for evaluation of intraobserver reliability. Senior2 and junior reviewers assessed the MR images once. Pure edema endplate signal changes were classified as Modic type I, and pure fatty endplate changes as Modic type II. A mixture of types I and II but predominantly edema signal changes was classified as Modic I-2 and a mixture of types I and II but predominantly fatty changes was classified as Modic II-1.ResultsThe intraobserver agreement was excellent (weighted kappa 0.85). The interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial (weighted kappa range 0.56-0.74). Interobserver reliability depended on the experience of the observer, thus highlighting the importance of a learning curve.ConclusionThis study shows that the modified Modic classification is reliable and easy to apply for observers with different clinical experience. The inclusion of mixed marrow changes in the modified classification may have clinical and therapeutic implications.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.