• Jae Young Hong, Seung Woo Suh, Hitesh N Modi, Chang Yong Hur, Hae Ryong Song, and Jong Hoon Park.
• Department of Orthopedics, Scoliosis Research Institute, Korea University Guro Hospital, 80 Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul 152-703, South Korea.
• Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep 1;19(9):1551-7.

AbstractSeveral methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. In adult scoliosis patients, the measurement is difficult due to degenerative changes in the vertebral endplate as well as the coronal and sagittal deformity. We did the observational study with three examiners to determine the reliability of six methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis patients. Ninety lateral lumbar radiographs were collected for the study. The radiographs were divided into normal (Cobb < 10 degrees ), low-grade (Cobb 10 degrees -19 degrees ), high-grade (Cobb >or= 20 degrees ) group to determine the reliability of Cobb L1-S1, Cobb L1-L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1-S1, posterior tangent L1-L5 and TRALL method in adult scoliosis. The 90 lateral radiographs were measured twice by each of the three examiners using the six measurement methods. The data was analyzed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. In general, for the six radiographic methods, the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all >or=0.82. A comparison of the ICCs and 95% CI for the inter- and intra-observer reliability between the groups with varying degrees of scoliosis showed that, the reliability of the lordosis measurement decreased with increasing severity of scoliosis. In Cobb L1-S1, centroid and posterior tangent L1-S1 methods, the ICCs were relatively lower in the high-grade scoliosis group (>or=0.60). And, the mean absolute difference (MAD) in these methods was high in the high-grade scoliosis group (or=0.86 in all groups. And, in the TRALL method, the ICCs were >or=0.76 in all groups. In addition, in the Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-L5 method, the MAD was

11 keywords...

hide…