• J Shoulder Elbow Surg · Jun 2010

    Comparative Study

    Biomechanical comparison of a proximal humeral locking plate using two methods of head fixation.

    • Ross A Schumer, Kara L Muckley, Ronald J Markert, Michael J Prayson, Jonathan Heflin, Emmanuel K Konstantakos, and Tarun Goswami.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wright State University, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, USA. rossaf44@yahoo.com
    • J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun 1;19(4):495-501.

    HypothesisLocking plates have emerged as the implant of choice for stabilization of proximal humeral fractures. The biomechanical properties of a locked plating system using smooth pegs vs threaded screws for fixation of the humeral head were compared to test the hypothesis that there would be no biomechanical difference between pegs and threaded screws.Materials And MethodsSixteen pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric humeri were randomized to have a surgical neck gap osteotomy stabilized with a locked plate using threaded screws (n=8) or smooth pegs (n=8). The intact contralateral humerus served as a control. Each specimen was tested with simultaneous cyclic axial compression (40 Nm) and torsion (both +/-2 Nm and +/-5 Nm) for 6000 cycles. All specimens were loaded to failure. Interfragmentary motion and load-displacement curves were analyzed to identify differences between the groups. Our data were then compared to previously published forces across the glenohumeral joint to provide evidence based recommendations for postoperative use of the shoulder.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference between test specimens and their paired control (P < .001) in cyclic testing and load to failure. Differences between the smooth pegs and threaded screws were not statistically significant.DiscussionThere is no biomechanical difference between locked smooth pegs and locked threaded screws for proximal fragment fixation in an unstable 2-part proximal humeral fracture model.ConclusionOur study contributes to the published evidence evaluating forces across the glenohumeral joint and suggests that early use of the affected extremity for simple activities of daily living may be safe. Use of the arm for assisted ambulation requiring a crutch, cane, walker, or wheelchair should be determined on a case-by-case basis.Copyright 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…