• Rev Mal Respir · Apr 2004

    Review

    [Current treatment of primary and secondary pneumothorax].

    • P Van Schil and B de Vos.
    • Département de Chirurgie Thoracique et Vasculaire, Hôpital Universitaire d'Anvers, Edegem, Belgique. paul.van.schil@uza.be
    • Rev Mal Respir. 2004 Apr 1;21(2 Pt 1):372-80.

    IntroductionThe treatment of a primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax remains controversial and many therapeutic options exist. In the event of a first episode of pneumothorax, should the patient be treated by observation, aspiration or thoracic drainage? For patients undergoing a thoracoscopic intervention for a spontaneous pneumothorax which is the best technique to treat the lung and parietal pleura? What are the results of thoracoscopy compared to thoracotomy and are the costs comparable?PerspectivesThe optimal treatment for a first episode of pneumothorax remains to be determined. As there are only a limited number of patients in the published randomised controlled studies only grade B or C recommendations can be given. This is also true for the treatment of the lung and parietal pleura during a thoracoscopic intervention. Most authors advise that an apical pleurectomy is performed. With regard to results and cost of thoracoscopy compared to thoracotomy, conflicting results have been published and definite conclusions cannot be drawn.ConclusionAs large randomised prospective studies are not available regarding the treatment of pneumothorax only grade B or C recommendations can be given.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…