• David Moreno-Ramirez, Lara Ferrandiz, Adoracion Nieto-Garcia, Rafael Carrasco, Pedro Moreno-Alvarez, Rafael Galdeano, Esther Bidegain, Juan J Rios-Martin, and Francisco M Camacho.
• Pigmented Lesion, Skin Cancer, and Teledermatology Clinic, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain. dmoreno@e-derma.org
• Arch Dermatol. 2007 Apr 1;143(4):479-84.

ObjectiveTo evaluate a store-and-forward teledermatology system aimed at the routine triage of patients with skin cancer.DesignA multicenter, longitudinal, 4-phase, descriptive and evaluation study of a referred sample of patients attended through teleconsultation between March 2004 and July 2005 (n = 2009). Clinical and dermoscopical examination and histopathological study were considered the gold standard.SettingA skin cancer unit of a public university hospital and 12 primary care centers in southern Spain.PatientsThe study population comprised patients with circumscribed lesions fulfilling at least 1 of the following criteria: changes in ABCD criteria (asymmetry, border irregularity, color variegation, and diameter >6 mm), recent history, multiple melanocytic lesions, symptoms, and/or patient's application for surgical treatment and concern about moles.InterventionsDiagnosis, diagnostic category (malignant lesions, high-risk lesions, benign lesions, special lesions, and other lesions), diagnostic confidence level on a 3-point scale, and management decision (referral vs nonreferral) were listed after the evaluation of each teleconsultation. A face-to-face evaluation and biopsy of selected patients were performed.Main Outcome MeasuresThe filtering percentage, as the percentage of patients not referred to the face-to-face clinic, as well as waiting intervals and pick-up or skin cancer detection rates were evaluated as effectiveness indicators. Reliability measures (kappa agreement), accuracy, and diagnostic performance indicators (validity) were also evaluated.ResultsThe filtering percentage was 51.20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.00%-53.40%). The waiting interval to attend the clinic was 12.31 days (95% CI, 8.22-16.40 days) through teledermatology and 88.62 days (95% CI, 38.42-138.82 days; P<.001) for the letter referral system. Pick-up rates were 2.02% (95% CI, 1.10%-2.94%) for malignant melanoma and 27.94% (95% CI, 24.98%-30.90%) or 1:3.71 for patients with any malignant or premalignant lesion. Intraobserver agreement was kappa = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93) for the management decision and kappa = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.96) for the diagnosis. Interobserver concordance was kappa = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.88) for the management decision and kappa = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91) for the diagnosis. Accuracy was kappa = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.84). Sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00); specificity, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.69); pretest likelihood, 0.42 (95% CI, 0.37-0.47); positive posttest likelihood, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.61-0.69); and negative posttest likelihood, 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.05).ConclusionStore-and-forward teledermatology has demonstrated in this series to be an effective, accurate, reliable, and valid approach for the routine management of patient referrals in skin cancer and pigmented lesion clinics.

15 keywords...

hide…