-
- Paul Axelsson, Ragnar Johnsson, and Björn Strömqvist.
- Department of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. paul.axelsson@skane.se
- Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec 1;78(6):834-9.
Background And PurposeIncreased intradiscal pressure and relative segmental hypermobility are in vitro observations supporting the idea of increased postoperative load being a reason for progressive degeneration of the free mobile segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. These mechanisms have been difficult to confirm in clinical studies, and an alternative theory claims instead that the adjacent segment degeneration follows a natural degenerative course in patients who are predisposed. We examined 9 patients 5 years after lumbar fusion, to assess whether relative hypermobility of the segment adjacent to fusion could be correlated to progressive degeneration of the same segment.Patients And MethodsThe 9 patients, all of whom had been treated with a lumbar fusion after a preoperative intervertebral mobility assessment by spinal RSA, were re-examined 5 years after surgery. The intervertebral translations of the vertebra proximal to the fusion were determined by RSA and compared to the mobility of the same lumbar segment before fusion. The disc height and any progressive reduction at the two levels proximal to the one fused were measured on conventional radiographs.ResultsAdjacent segment mobility 5 years after fusion--expressed as mean transverse, vertical, and sagittal translation of the vertebra proximal to fusion--was not significantly changed compared to the mobility measured before surgery. Increased mobility of the segment seen in 5 individual patients was not associated with progressive degeneration of the same segment or to a poor clinical outcome.InterpretationHypermobility of the segment adjacent to fusion is not a general finding. Increased mobility that can be seen in certain individuals does not impair the 5-year result. The significance of mechanical alterations in adjacent segment degeneration is uncertain, and it is possibly overestimated.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.