• Hassan Al-Thani, Ayman El-Menyar, and Rifat Latifi.
• Department of Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
• N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jan 1;6(1):12-8.

BackgroundThe impact of prehospital intubation (PHI) in improving outcome of trauma patients has not been adequately evaluated in the developing countries.AimsThe present study analyzed the outcome of PHI versus emergency room intubation (ERI) among trauma patients in Qatar.Materials And MethodsData were retrospectively reviewed for all intubated trauma patients between 2010 and 2011. Patients were classified according to location of intubation (PHI: Group-1 versus ERI: Group-2). Data were analyzed and compared.ResultsOut of 570 intubated patients; 482 patients (239 in group-1 and 243 in group-2) met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 32 ΁ 14.6 years Head injury (P = 0.003) and multiple trauma (P = 0.004) were more prevalent in group-1, whereas solid organ injury predominated in group-2 (P = 0.02). Group-1 had significantly higher mean injury severity scoring (ISS), lower Glasgow coma scale (GCS), greater head abbreviated injury score and longer activation, response, scene and total emergency medical services times. The mortality was higher in group-1 (53% vs. 18.5%; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that GCS [odds ratio (OR) 0.78, P = 0.005) and ISS (OR 1.12, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of mortality.ConclusionsPHI is associated with high mortality when compared with ERI. However, selection bias cannot be ruled out and therefore, PHI needs further critical assessment in Qatar.

5 keywords...

hide…