• Gwyneth Davies, Anne-Marie Gibson, Maureen Swanney, Deborah Murray, and Lutz Beckert.
• Canterbury Respiratory Services, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
• N. Z. Med. J. 2003 Jan 24;116(1168):U297.

AimTo assess the level of understanding of pulse oximetry in a hospital setting and identify training needs.MethodsTwenty nine nurses and 34 doctors anonymously completed a questionnaire survey previously used by researchers in Exeter, UK. Respondents were required to explain the basic principles of pulse oximetry and demonstrate an understanding of the physiological factors limiting its accuracy. They were asked to apply their knowledge in different clinical scenarios.ResultsA higher proportion of nurses than doctors demonstrated an awareness of the physiological limitations of pulse oximetry. The majority of respondents correctly identified normal ranges for adult patients. Twenty nine per cent of respondents did not know how a pulse oximeter worked. Respondents failed to recognise the clinical implications of low oxygen saturations in many of the hypothetical scenarios. Only 16% of respondents had received any formal training in the use of pulse oximetry, with 65% identifying a need for more training.ConclusionsMedical and nursing staff at Christchurch Hospital have a good understanding of pulse oximetry. A higher proportion of participants were aware of checking vital signs when the oximeter reading was unreliable, than in the original UK study cohort. A need was identified for further education in this core technique. Staff training may increase the clinical value of pulse oximetry.

21 keywords...

hide…