-
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis · Jan 2014
Comparative StudyPulmonary function impairment in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema with and without airflow obstruction.
- Yoshiaki Kitaguchi, Keisaku Fujimoto, Masayuki Hanaoka, Takayuki Honda, Junichi Hotta, and Jiro Hirayama.
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan ; Department of Internal Medicine, Okaya City Hospital, Okaya, Japan.
- Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Jan 1;9:805-11.
BackgroundThe syndrome of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a recently described entity associating upper-lobe emphysema and lower-lobe fibrosis. We sought to evaluate differences in pulmonary function between CPFE patients with and without airflow obstruction.Subjects And MethodsThirty-one CPFE patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of irreversible airflow obstruction based on spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <70% following inhalation of a β2-agonist) as follows: CPFE patients with airflow obstruction (CPFE OB(+) group, n=11), and CPFE patients without airflow obstruction (CPFE OB(-) group, n=20). Pulmonary function, including respiratory impedance evaluated using impulse oscillometry and dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation, was retrospectively analyzed in comparison with that observed in 49 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients (n=49).ResultsIn imaging findings, low-attenuation-area scores on chest high-resolution computed tomography, representing the degree of emphysema, were significantly lower in the CPFE OB(-) group than in the CPFE OB(+) and COPD groups. In contrast, the severity of pulmonary fibrosis was greater in the CPFE OB(-) group than in the CPFE OB(+) group. In pulmonary function, lung hyperinflation was not apparent in the CPFE OB(-) group. Impairment of diffusion capacity was severe in both the CPFE OB(-) and CPFE OB(+) groups. Impulse oscillometry showed that respiratory resistance was not apparent in the CPFE OB(-) group compared with the COPD group, and that easy collapsibility of small airways during expiration of tidal breath was not apparent in the CPFE OB(+) group compared with the COPD group. Dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation was significantly greater in the COPD group than in the CPFE OB(-) group, and also tended to be greater in the CPFE OB(+) group than in the CPFE OB(-) group.ConclusionThe mechanisms underlying impairment of physiological function may differ among CPFE OB(+) patients, CPFE OB(-) patients, and COPD patients. CPFE is a heterogeneous disease, and may have distinct phenotypes physiologically and radiologically.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.