• BJOG · Dec 2006

    Multicenter Study

    Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks.

    • C L Emmett, A R G Shaw, A A Montgomery, D J Murphy, and DiAMOND study group.
    • Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. clare.emmett@bristol.ac.uk
    • BJOG. 2006 Dec 1;113(12):1438-45.

    ObjectiveTo explore women's experiences of decision making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section.DesignA qualitative interview study.SettingTwo city maternity units in southwest England and Eastern Scotland.SampleTwenty-one women who had recently delivered a baby and whose previous child was delivered by caesarean section.MethodsSemi-structured interviews analysed using the framework approach.Main Outcome MeasuresWomen's views on the influence of uncertainty on decision making, issues concerning information provision and decision-making roles.ResultsExperiences of decision making varied considerably. Some women were certain about choosing either vaginal birth after caesarean or repeat elective caesarean section, others were very uncertain and for some this uncertainty persisted after the birth. Information was most commonly provided by hospital doctors (mainly consultants) and more often related to procedural issues rather than possible health risks and benefits. Women felt they had to actively seek information rather than it being provided routinely. Most women were able to make their own decision about mode of delivery. Health professionals generally took a supportive role whichever mode of delivery was chosen. Although many women were comfortable with this approach, some felt they would have liked more guidance.ConclusionOn the whole, women experienced having control over the decision about planned mode of delivery. For many, making this decision was difficult and for some it was the cause of prolonged anxiety. Women were often making the decision without being provided with comprehensive and specific information about possible health risks and benefits. We are currently conducting a randomised controlled trial to investigate whether access to a decision aid is beneficial to women in this situation.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…