• C M Puttlitz, V K Goel, C R Clark, and V C Traynelis.
• Department of Biomedical Engineering, Iowa Spine Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
• Spine. 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2868-76.

Study DesignA finite element investigation to determine the causal mechanisms that lead to odontoid fracture.ObjectivesTo elucidate which loading scenarios, including rotational moments, compression-tension, and lateral and anteroposterior shear, can result in Type I, Type II, and Type III odontoid failures.Summary Of Background DataThere is considerable controversy about the major loading path that causes odontoid fractures. A review of the clinical and laboratory research literature did not provide a consensus on this issue.MethodsA three-dimensional, nonlinear finite element model of the occipito-atlantoaxial (C0-C1-C2) complex was generated from human cadaveric data. Force loads were applied at the posterior margin of the occiput and were applied as lone entities or after the model was prepositioned in flexion, extension, or lateral-bending moments through applied rotation moments. Intraosseous stresses were reported to characterize the probability of fracture due to the applied loadings.ResultsThe data indicate that hyperextension can lead to failure of the odontoid at its superior tip (Type I). Finite element model predictions also demonstrated the propensity of loads that induce axial rotation to create relatively high maximum von Mises stress in the Type II fracture region. Flexion prepositioning reduced the stress response of the odontoid.ConclusionsForce loading that puts the head in extension coupled with lateral shear or compression leads to Type I fractures, whereas axial rotation and lateral shear can produce Type II fractures. The model failed to elucidate causal mechanisms for Type III fractures. Flexion seems to provide a protective mechanism against force application that would otherwise cause a higher risk of odontoid failure.

25 keywords...

hide…