• Jan Schmutz, Tanja Manser, Julia Keil, Ellen Heimberg, and Florian Hoffmann.
• Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: jschmutz@ethz.ch.
• J. Pediatr. 2015 Jun 1;166(6):1498-504.e1.

ObjectiveTo develop and validate 3 performance evaluation checklists (PECs) for systematic performance assessment in 3 clinical scenarios: cardiopulmonary arrest, dyspnea with oxygen desaturation after intubation, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).Study DesignThe 3 PECs were developed using an integrative approach and used to rate 50 training sessions in a simulator environment by different raters. Construct validity was tested by correlating the checklist scores with external constructs (ie, global rating, team experience level, and time to action). Further interrater reliability was tested for all 3 PECs.ResultsThe PECs for the desaturation and cardiopulmonary arrest scenarios were valid and reliable, whereas the PEC for RSV had limited validity and reliability.ConclusionFor 2 pediatric emergencies, the PEC is a valid and reliable tool for systematic performance assessment. The unsatisfactory results for the PEC for RSV may be related to limitations of the simulation setting and require further investigation. Structured assessment of clinical performance can augment feedback on technical performance aspects and is essential for training purposes as well as for research. Only reliable and valid performance measures will allow medical educators to accurately evaluate the behavioral effects of training interventions and further enhance the quality of patient care.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

19 keywords...

hide…