• Annals of plastic surgery · Jan 2015

    Review

    Combined Achilles tendon and soft tissue defects: functional outcomes of free tissue transfers and tendon vascularization.

    • Matthew L Iorio, Kevin D Han, Karen K Evans, and Christopher E Attinger.
    • From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
    • Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan 1;74(1):121-5.

    BackgroundRupture of the Achilles tendon can be a debilitating event, affecting ankle stability and gait efficiency. When this rupture is combined with a large soft tissue defect, reconstruction of the tendon and free tissue transfer for wound resurfacing should be considered.MethodsA systematic review of the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases from January 1950 to August 2012 was completed. Search criteria identified all reports of vascularized, autograft, and allograft Achilles tendon reconstruction in combination with free tissue transfer. Inclusion criteria included strict objective outcomes of ankle range of motion and/or dynamometer testing. Correlated outcomes for the affected and normal extremities were accomplished using a subgroup comparison for the vascularized and avascular tendon reconstruction techniques with a 2-tailed z test for independent proportions.ResultsFifteen retrospective studies fit the inclusion criteria, representing 44 patients at an average age of 33 years. Twenty-two (50%) patients had a localized infection before reconstruction. Average skin defect was 85.3 (74.4) cm2, and average tendon gap was 7.8 (1.7) cm. Thirty (68%) patients underwent free tissue transfer with vascularized tendon reconstruction, 7 (16%) had either nonvascularized autograft or allograft, 5 (11%) had a muscle interposition, and 2 (5%) patients had combined vascularized and nonvascularized tendon repair. Overall average total range of motion was 54.6 (11.5) degrees. Repairs with vascularized tendon had an overall range of motion 80% of the unaffected side (55.4 vs 69.4 degrees) compared to avascular tendon repairs, at an average range of motion 82% of the unaffected side (51.2 vs 62.3 degrees) (P = 0.73). Dynamometric comparison with the unaffected extremity gave an average deficit for avascular reconstructions at 21.2% and 24.8% for 30 to 60 and 120 degrees/s, respectively, compared to an average deficit of 32.3% and 31.5% in the vascularized reconstructions (P = 0.55 and P = 0.78, respectively).ConclusionsFor combined free tissue transfer and Achilles tendon reconstruction, there seems to be no functional superiority in ankle range of motion or strength when vascularized tendon repairs were compared to avascular autograft and allograft methods.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…