• James M Compliment, Marla S Gendelman, Jacalyn F Allera, Martin Matisz, Janet Horvath, Kathleen M Hores, Kim Sperring, Cheryl Herbert, Jamie M Smith, Bonnie Jean Kurpakus, Karl M Borgman, and J Christopher Post.
• Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA. jcomplim@wpahs.org
• Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Nov 1;67(11):1159-68.

ContextOtitis media (OM) is the most common reason that a child undergoes a general anesthetic, with the total costs of treating this disease exceeding five billion dollars annually. Concerns regarding the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms in response to medical treatment for OM have fueled the demand for surgical intervention. However, reimbursements are decreasing. Non-traditional settings for children requiring bilateral myringotomy and tube (BMT) placement for ear disease have the potential to offer the same degree of patient safety and improved efficiency but at lower cost.ObjectiveTo develop a non-traditional setting for BMT surgery that is safe, cost effective, and well received by patients, families and staff.DesignProspective design of an outpatient treatment suite (OTS) for BMT placement; prospective evaluation of safety and family satisfaction; analysis of costs.SettingA 778 bed US urban area level one trauma center and teaching hospital, with a 2160 ft(2) electro-convulsive therapy suite that was underutilized and non-revenue generating on Tuesdays and Thursdays.ParticipantsA design task force of health care providers, administrators and operations personnel; 794 healthy children between the ages of 6 months to 16 years requiring BMT surgery; 100 families of patients.Main Outcome MeasuresFinancial comparison was made between the traditional operating room (OR) setting, the outpatient surgery center (SC) and the OTS comparing overhead and indirect costs to run each site. A prospective survey was conducted of 100 consecutive patients undergoing surgery between November 2000 and June 2001. The survey was conducted at the 2 weeks postoperative check and was composed of 18 questions divided into five sections, with a 5-point rating scheme, with one being very poor, and five being very good.ResultsDesigning a new treatment venue was successful because of teamwork and a willingness to think creatively. The OTS was found to be far more cost-effective than both the main OR and SC for BMTs. The contribution to margin for the SC was US$ 280 per case and for the main OR was US$ 2130 per case. By operating on 794 patients in OTS, the hospital was able to generate additional contribution to margin of US$ 197,100 when compared to the cost of performing these cases in the SC and US$ 1,499,500 when compared to performing all cases in the main OR. No adverse consequences were noted. Patient/Family satisfaction was also rated very high, with an overall rating of 4.85 and markedly reduced time in hospital.ConclusionOperating rooms (ORs) today are busier than in years past, but revenues barely meet or in some cases fall below expenses due to insurers' decreased reimbursement. This innovative approach to BMT placement has been shown to be safe and results in excellent family satisfaction, with a substantial contribution to margin. As over one million BMT cases are performed annually in the US, adoption of this approach nationally has the potential to markedly reduce the treatment costs of this common disease.

17 keywords...

hide…