-
Oper Orthop Traumatol · Feb 2012
[Augmented posterior instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].
- D Krappinger, T J Kastenberger, and R Schmid.
- Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Sporttraumatologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck. dietmar@krappinger.eu
- Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Feb 1;24(1):4-12.
ObjectiveReduction and stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures using posterior short-segment instrumentation. Cement augmentation of the pedicle screws in order to improve the screw’s holding power in osteoporotic bone and to reduce postoperative loss of reduction. Quick and painless postoperative mobilization without further bracing.IndicationsBurst fractures (type A3 according to Magerl). Posttraumatic kyphosis following osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Revision surgery after screw loosening. Type B and C fractures according to Magerl.ContraindicationsOsteoporotic fractures which are suitable for nonoperative treatment or percutaneous cement augmentation techniques (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty). Vertebral body fractures in patients with good bone quality.Surgical TechniqueInsertion of pedicle screws in a typical manner. If perforated screws are used, cement application under fluoroscopic control via the central perforation of the screws. If pedicle screws without perforation are used, application of the cement using a Kyphoplasty technique and insertion of the screws. After hardening of the cement, completion of the instrumentation.Postoperative ManagementMobilization starting on the first day after surgery. Avoidance of heavy lifting and manual labor for 3 months. Implant removal only if it is necessary due to complications.ResultsBetween July 2008 and December 2009, 10 patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine were treated with cement-augmented posterior instrumentation. The mean age was 65.8 years (range 35–94 years). There were six type A (2 A1 and 4 A3 lesions) and four type B lesions (1 B1, 1 B2, and 2 B3 lesions) according to Magerl. Indications for cement augmentation of the pedicle screws were the patients’ age (4 patients), osteoporosis with t scores < − 2.5 (2 patients), poor intraoperative screw hold (2 patients), and revision surgery after loosening of pedicle screws (2 patients). Cement leakage was observed in 5 patients with no further clinical relevance. Loosening of cement augmented pedicle screws occurred in 1 patient with a consecutive loss of reduction of 10°. There was no need to remove any of the cement-augmented screws in the first 24 months.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.