• Per Rotbøll Nielsen, Jakob Andreasen, Mikael Asmussen, and Hanne Tønnesen.
• Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Department of Anaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. rotboell@rh.dk
• Bmc Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 1;8:209.

UnlabelledDuring the recent years improved operation techniques and administrative procedures have been developed for early rehabilitation. At the same time preoperative lifestyle intervention (prehabilitation) has revealed a large potential for additional risk reduction. The aim was to assess the quality of life and to estimate the cost-effectiveness of standard care versus an integrated programme including prehabilitation and early rehabilitation.MethodsThe analyses were based on the results from 60 patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar disease; 28 patients were randomised to the integrated programme and 32 to the standard care programme. Data on cost and health related quality of life was collected preoperatively, during hospitalisation and postoperatively. The cost was estimated from multiplication of the resource consumption and price per unit.ResultsOverall there was no difference in health related quality of life scores. The patients from the integrated programme obtained their postoperative milestones sooner, returned to work and soaked less primary care after discharge. The integrated programme was 1,625 euros (direct costs 494 euros + indirect costs 1,131 euros) less costly per patient compared to the standard care programme.ConclusionThe integrated programme of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in spine surgery is more cost-effective compared to standard care programme alone.

35 keywords...

hide…