• J M Engel, J Muhling, A Junger, T Menges, B Karcher, and G Hempelmann.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Management, University Hospital Giessen, Germany.
• Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr 1;22(2):187-92.

AbstractThe object of this study was to document enteral feeding practice in critically ill patients in a surgical intensive care unit. We asked what proportion of measured energy expenditure is delivered enterally. Patient, material, and therapy-related factors should be assessed and related to enteral nutrition. Sixty patients receiving enteral nutrition for a period of at least 10 days were included in the study. Mean daily energy expenditure was 27.8+8.7 kcal/kg. Mean daily enteral delivered calories reached 19.7+/-10.3 kcal/kg (P<0.05). Twenty-one out of 60 (35%) patients were fed isocalorically; 46% of enteral nutrition days failed to reach 80% of energy expenditure. Ten out of 30 patients (33%) fed over a gastric tube were nourished isocalorically in comparison to 8 out of 20 patients (40%) fed over a duodenal tube. Factors associated with hypocaloric enteral feeding in multiple logistic regression were abdominal, pelvic and lumbal spine trauma, gastrointestinal intolerance, problems with the feeding tube, additional surgical interventions, airway management and use of fentanyl. In the course of the study, gastrointestinal complications were the cause for more than 50% of insufficient enteral delivery cases, while therapy and material related reasons contribute to only a minor part.Abdominal, pelvic and lumbal spine traumas are associated with a higher possibility towards developing problems with enteral delivery, as shown by odds-ratios greater than eight. These diagnoses amounted in our investigation to nearly 40% and make a great difference to medical patients. Therefore, recommendations for optimising enteral feeding must take the concerned patient collective into account.

19 keywords...

hide…