• J Thorac Imaging · Mar 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Reproducibility of a scoring system for computed tomography scanning in cystic fibrosis.

    • Alan S Brody, Michael R Kosorok, Zhanhai Li, Lynn S Broderick, Jeffrey L Foster, Anita Laxova, Hari Bandla, and Philip M Farrell.
    • Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA. alan.brody@cchmc.org
    • J Thorac Imaging. 2006 Mar 1;21(1):14-21.

    IntroductionComputerized tomography (CT) scanning shows promise as an outcome surrogate for cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease progression. The scoring system used to convert the CT image to numeric data is an essential determinant of the performance of CT scanning.MethodsThree radiologists independently scored 16 high-resolution CT scans performed on children in the Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project. The test scans were selected to provide a broad range of disease severity. The scoring system provided subscores for the presence and severity of 5 findings of CF lung disease. The sum of the subscores provided a total score. The CT scans were then read again by each of the radiologists at least 11 months later. Using Mixed Effects Linear Model Analysis, the sources of error (scan-to-scan variation, interrater variance, and intrarater variance) were calculated.ResultsFor the total score, the scan-to-scan variation was 14.48, interrater variance was 0.28, and intrarater variance was 0.45, with an overall reproducibility of 95%. The square root of scan-to-scan variance, a measure of sensitivity, was 3.81. Evaluation of the subscores showed higher reproducibility for bronchiectasis and hyperinflation (95% and 88%, respectively). The bronchiectasis score was more sensitive than the air-trapping score (1.46 vs. 0.89).DiscussionThis system was developed to provide a reproducible method that could be used to evaluate the lobar location, severity, and extent of a broad spectrum of CT features of CF lung disease, especially in children. This study demonstrates that the overall score is both sensitive to variation in the severity of lung disease and reproducible.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…