• Wai May Leong and Ee Lyn Ong.
• Department of Anesthesia, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, S, 529889, Singapore.
• J Anesth. 2005 Jan 1;19(2):112-7.

PurposeIn this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we investigated the reliability of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion with inhaled desflurane.MethodsEighty patients undergoing elective surgery were randomized into two groups to receive either 2.5 mg x kg(-1) propofol (n = 40) or tidal breath desflurane (n = 40) induction followed by LMA insertion. All patients received fentanyl 1 microg x kg(-1) 2 min before induction. Inhalation of desflurane was started at 3% and increased by 3% every 3-5 breaths up to settings of 12%.ResultsInsertion of the LMA was faster in the propofol group (131.8 s versus 228.6 s, P < 0.01). The number of patients in whom the jaw opening was described as good (95% versus 72.5%, P = 0.27, for the desflurane and propofol groups, respectively) and the ease of LMA insertion described as good (87.5% versus 72.5%, P = 0.6) were comparable. The LMA was inserted in a single attempt in the majority of patients in both groups (80% versus 77.5%, P = 0.90). There were more complications at insertion in the propofol group than in the desflurane group (2.5% versus 19.5%, P < 0.01), especially for apnea (7.5% versus 70%, P < 0.01) and excitatory movements (2.5% versus 25%, P < 0.01). There were significant decreases in the mean arterial pressure in the propofol group compared to baseline data over the first 5 min of induction. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and S(p)(O2) remained stable during the same period in the desflurane group.ConclusionWe demonstrated that inhaled desflurane when used with caution in a controlled manner provided acceptable conditions for LMA insertion.

12 keywords...

hide…