• S Schick, S Trattnig, C Gäbler, C Kukla, A Gahleitner, F Kainberger, A Ba-Ssalamah, and M Breitenseher.
• MR Bereich und Abteilung für Osteologie, Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Universität Wien.
• Rofo. 1999 Jan 1;170(1):16-21.

PurposeTo compare the diagnostic value of high definition macroradiography and MRI in patients with the suspicion of occult wrist fractures.Materials And MethodsIn a prospective study, 23 patients with clinically suspected wrist fractures and normal initial plain radiographs underwent high resolution macroradiography and MR imaging shortly after trauma. Macroradiographs were taken with a microfocus tube using an anode of 0.03-0.3 mm providing a 4x magnification of the wrist, which was obtained in 4 projections. MR images were performed on a 1.0 T MR unit in coronal planes using T1 weighted SE, T2.-weighted 3D GE, and Turbo-STIR sequences. Follow-up radiographs after 6 weeks were used to confirm the diagnosis of a primary occult wrist fracture.ResultsMacroradiography depicted 5 wrist fractures: 4 fractures of the scaphoid bone and 1 fracture of the capitate bone. MRI demonstrated 11 fractures (one of them false-positive): 9 fractures of the scaphoid bone and two fractures of the capitate bone. Using macroradiography, the sensitivity for the detection of occult fractures of the wrist was 50% with a specificity of 100%, using MRI the sensitivity was 100% with a specificity of 92%.ConclusionMRI seems to be superior to high resolution macroradiography in the detection of occult scaphoid fractures and thus is recommended in the management of patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fractures not evident on initial plain films.

19 keywords...

hide…