• Pain physician · Apr 2005

    A systematic review of diagnostic utility of selective nerve root blocks.

    • Clifford R Everett, Rinoo V Shah, Nalini Sehgal, and Anne Marie McKenzie-Brown.
    • University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. clifford_everett@URMC.Rochester.edu
    • Pain Physician. 2005 Apr 1;8(2):225-33.

    BackgroundTransforaminal epidural injections, or selective nerve root blocks, are used for a myriad of different spinal disorders. A clear consensus on the use of selective nerve root injections as a diagnostic tool does not currently exist. Additionally, the effectiveness of this procedure as a diagnostic tool is not clear.ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate the accuracy of selective nerve root injections in diagnosing spinal disorders.Study DesignThe study involved a systematic review of diagnostic studies about selective nerve root blocks for the diagnosis of spinal pain.MethodsA systematic review of the literature for clinical studies was performed to assess the accuracy of selective nerve root injections in diagnosing spinal disorders. Methodologic quality evaluation was performed utilizing AHRQ and QUADAS criteria. The methodology of the studies was graded and the evidence was classified into five levels: conclusive, strong, moderate, limited, or indeterminate.ResultsThere is limited evidence on the effectiveness of selective nerve root injections as a diagnostic tool in spinal disorder. There is insufficient research into this area for strong support, but the available literature is supportive of selective nerve root injections as a diagnostic test in equivocal radicular pain. The current analysis provides moderate evidence of transforaminal epidural injections in the preoperative evaluation of patients with negative or inconclusive imaging studies.ConclusionsSelective nerve root injections may be helpful as a diagnostic addition in evaluating spinal disorders with radicular features, but the role of this diagnostic test needs to be further clarified by additional research and consensus on technique.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.