• Khalid F Almoosa, Joanna Abraham, Thomas G Kannampallil, and Vimla L Patel.
• Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: abrahamj@uic.edu.
• J Crit Care. 2014 Apr 1;29(2):311.e1-7.

PurposeHandoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format.MethodA nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns.ResultsUse of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions.ConclusionThe HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…